Addendum to the previous post

The iPad is giving me a hard time making an addendum on the previous one, so I will add it here as a new post instead.

The remarks in the last post were prompted by Laruelle, though Derrida does the same thing on a regular basis.

I’m aware that Badiou seems to be an exception, since he speaks in positive terms of classical philosophy as any kind that resists the critical injunction of Kant. I appreciate both the sentiment and the definition. I’m simply not convinced that Badiou meets his own criteria for classical here.