Google’s version of the Korean page to which I just linked

Hat tip to Steven Shaviro on this one:

“I am the root (radix), the surface of the world’s ultimate no ultimate philosophical roots, so the target (object) the characteristics of its own in the direction of two contrasting pieces from [the opposite] torn polarized (polarized) philosophy is proposed. We should oppose radicalism, which the name of sober moderation (in which case other than a wise career choice that this philosophy lira), but in weirdness (weirdness) should do so in the name. Radical Philosophy is not bizarre enough, nor Aristotle, since the reality in the built-in basic ambiguity never fully concentrate did not. radical philosophy, all essentially reductionist is. Such philosophies humans to access up-to reduced Whether or more underlying layers down to the reduction, whether All of them are real (reality), half the other half generated by the welcome is just said. as opposed to the target polarization, non-committal, or is a place of being bizarre. Meanwhile, the type of target hwahaneun their relationships with all the features from autonomous, but on the other hand the target completely autonomously’s not losing, if you cause we have a chance if she was re-integrate the theory can not be fully disconnected Shinto pluralistic universe of areas (multiverse) because you have been given. In other words, we target , their properties, events, relationships, and explains the differences between the instrument to be the target of reducing by one of these things work, we must not oversimplifying. All these terms are the subjects belonging to a unified only in feuds with the target because there is only a means. “